experimental feature "collab" is broken on main for API/free/plus/go users

Resolved 💬 8 comments Opened Feb 13, 2026 by lattwood Closed Feb 13, 2026
💡 Likely answer: A maintainer (github-actions[bot], contributor) responded on this thread — see the highlighted reply below.

What version of Codex CLI is running?

main

What subscription do you have?

N/A

Which model were you using?

gpt-5.2-codex

What platform is your computer?

_No response_

What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?

N/A

What issue are you seeing?

After @jif-oai merged #11745, hardcoding the Explorer AgentRole to have a fixed model override of gpt-5.3-codex-spark where it used to be gpt-5.1-codex-mini, trying to use the Experimental collab feature no longer works for users on a Free or Plus subscription as they don't have access to Codex Spark, as well as people using Codex CLI via API.

What steps can reproduce the bug?

Enable collab via /experimental or via editing ~/.codex/config.toml, and watch as it fails to explore due to model unavailability.

› Hey, use the explorer subagents to explain what models are used for exploring.


• Agent spawned
  └ call: call_9DPDLA2CS27lsprBo65AphhM
    agent: 019c5844-deb4-78e3-aa34-cffbb4be15e7
    status: pending init
    prompt: Find and explain which models are used for explorer subagents in this repo or docs. Look for any configuration/docs about explorer model selection.

• Waiting for agents
  └ call: call_ZR2b8AqVEiBggFUhdilh1PC1
    receivers: 019c5844-deb4-78e3-aa34-cffbb4be15e7

• Wait complete
  └ call: call_ZR2b8AqVEiBggFUhdilh1PC1
    agents: 1 total · 1 errored
    019c5844-deb4-78e3-aa34-cffbb4be15e7 errored: { "error": { "message": "The requested model 'gpt-5.3-codex-spark' does not exist.", "type": "invalid_request_error", "param": "model", "code": "model_not_fo...

What is the expected behavior?

I'd expect that if something is exposed via /experimental it wouldn't regress in such a way.

I'd completely understand this happening (but would still be bummed) if this was marked as Stage.UnderDevelopment.

Additional information

_No response_

View original on GitHub ↗

8 Comments

github-actions[bot] contributor · 5 months ago

Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.

  • #9783
  • #11468
  • #11684
  • #11623

Powered by Codex Action

lattwood · 5 months ago

They're similar but not duplicates

lattwood · 5 months ago

<3 ty

Szpadel · 5 months ago

@jif-oai could we maybe get configuration option for this? Or have spark with mini as a fallback?

lattwood · 5 months ago

@Szpadel I'm planning to compile it myself to use this exact change this weekend on my personal pro account

MrLightspeed · 5 months ago

Pro level options would be ideal. If someone qualifies for a higher tier, let them benefit.

jif-oai contributor · 5 months ago
Szpadel · 5 months ago

@jif-oai that is perfect, thank you