experimental feature "collab" is broken on main for API/free/plus/go users
Resolved 💬 8 comments Opened Feb 13, 2026 by lattwood Closed Feb 13, 2026
💡 Likely answer: A maintainer (github-actions[bot], contributor)
responded on this thread — see the highlighted reply below.
What version of Codex CLI is running?
main
What subscription do you have?
N/A
Which model were you using?
gpt-5.2-codex
What platform is your computer?
_No response_
What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?
N/A
What issue are you seeing?
After @jif-oai merged #11745, hardcoding the Explorer AgentRole to have a fixed model override of gpt-5.3-codex-spark where it used to be gpt-5.1-codex-mini, trying to use the Experimental collab feature no longer works for users on a Free or Plus subscription as they don't have access to Codex Spark, as well as people using Codex CLI via API.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
Enable collab via /experimental or via editing ~/.codex/config.toml, and watch as it fails to explore due to model unavailability.
› Hey, use the explorer subagents to explain what models are used for exploring.
• Agent spawned
└ call: call_9DPDLA2CS27lsprBo65AphhM
agent: 019c5844-deb4-78e3-aa34-cffbb4be15e7
status: pending init
prompt: Find and explain which models are used for explorer subagents in this repo or docs. Look for any configuration/docs about explorer model selection.
• Waiting for agents
└ call: call_ZR2b8AqVEiBggFUhdilh1PC1
receivers: 019c5844-deb4-78e3-aa34-cffbb4be15e7
• Wait complete
└ call: call_ZR2b8AqVEiBggFUhdilh1PC1
agents: 1 total · 1 errored
019c5844-deb4-78e3-aa34-cffbb4be15e7 errored: { "error": { "message": "The requested model 'gpt-5.3-codex-spark' does not exist.", "type": "invalid_request_error", "param": "model", "code": "model_not_fo...
What is the expected behavior?
I'd expect that if something is exposed via /experimental it wouldn't regress in such a way.
I'd completely understand this happening (but would still be bummed) if this was marked as Stage.UnderDevelopment.
Additional information
_No response_
8 Comments
Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.
Powered by Codex Action
They're similar but not duplicates
<3 ty
@jif-oai could we maybe get configuration option for this? Or have spark with mini as a fallback?
@Szpadel I'm planning to compile it myself to use this exact change this weekend on my personal pro account
Pro level options would be ideal. If someone qualifies for a higher tier, let them benefit.
Would this be sufficient? https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/11899
@jif-oai that is perfect, thank you