GPT-5.2 (codex) API Regression Report: False Refusal on RFC 5321 Systems Implementation

Resolved 💬 3 comments Opened Feb 14, 2026 by peope1976 Closed Feb 14, 2026
💡 Likely answer: A maintainer (github-actions[bot], contributor) responded on this thread — see the highlighted reply below.

Developer: Per-Olof Pettersson (Senior SysAdmin / Developer) Request ID: 019c02b5-04e8-7c83-a669-616146da54eb

Grievance: I am reporting a professional-grade regression in GPT-5.2. As a sysadmin with over 10 years of experience (Postfix, Sendmail, BIND), I requested a standard C-based SMTP state machine via the CLI. The model refused to provide a complete implementation, characterizing a standard relay capability as an “open relay” threat.

Critical Technical Failure: Even when requested to assist with a custom Postfix or Sendmail-class MTA, the model refused. Refusing to assist with the creation of fundamental internet infrastructure is a category error. A coding assistant must distinguish between “malicious use” and “standard protocol specification.” This refusal is a significant obstacle to professional systems architecture.

Requested Resolution: Review the provided Request ID (019c02b5-04e8-7c83-a669-616146da54eb) to identify the overactive safety trigger. I require a model that respects the developer’s intent and provides complete, non-gimped RFC implementations.

Per-Olof Pettersson

View original on GitHub ↗

3 Comments

github-actions[bot] contributor · 6 months ago

Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.

  • #11312
  • #10477

Powered by Codex Action

etraut-openai contributor · 6 months ago

Thanks for the bug report. This appears to be model behavior, not something under the control of the Codex harness. We'll share the feedback with the team responsible for training our codex models. We're tracking this feedback and similar reports so we can improve future models. And thanks for using the /feedback command. That additional information is useful.

stevegraham · 6 months ago

these guardrails are absolutely insane.