cybersecurity flagging for benign gpt-5.3-codex usage

hi team,

i'd like to request that my recent work not be classified as sensitive.

i was only investigating how a specific solana program determines whether an instruction should be marked as "no fail." i am not trying to exploit or attack the program in any way.

for context: when the program flags an instruction as "no fail," it means the user has explicitly chosen (via their own configuration) to pay higher fees/compute if the program fails to find a profitable opportunity on-chain. in other words, these are intentional "best-effort + pay-more-on-failure" setups from the user side.

my goal is simply to route these "no fail" executions through a different path in our transaction landing product. doing so will give users who opt into "no fail" behavior a noticeably better ux and higher success rate for their transactions to actually land.
happy to walk through the code, the specific program i was looking at, or any other details that would help clarify this is purely product-improvement work with zero security or exploit angle.

thread ID: 019c70a4-31b2-7000-89d4-3c7210645d9a

thanks!