Locked out of using gpt-5.3-codex suddenly while doing nothing malicious, cyber website not working showing ineligible!
Resolved 💬 6 comments Opened Feb 18, 2026 by AriaShishegaran Closed Feb 20, 2026
💡 Likely answer: A maintainer (github-actions[bot], contributor)
responded on this thread — see the highlighted reply below.
I was suddenly flagged for chatgpt cyber while doing nothing cyber sec or malicious, then i opened the cyber link to verify, it is not working at all!
basically im locked out, the email i sent to support team, is always, a boilerplate fake apology email, with instructions that goes nowhere since it is exactly what I'm already doing!
SB HELPPPP!!!
<img width="1642" height="1214" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d0c5bea0-232d-4a5e-81c2-498c2be2d67b" />
6 Comments
Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.
Powered by Codex Action
Same issue here.. 3 different docs, 3 differet clients..
Broken deployment/broken code..
Back to Claude it seems, as this is unusable with our workflow
Never gonna KYC for this. Its Mass Surveilance at its finest and will kill OpenAI.
100%.
I literally instantly switched to my max plan on claude code, to continue my work.
This is a poor deployment strategy of all levels
First of all if you cannot control your models, don't release it, if you do, don't ask me for extra verification, this is quickly becoming orwellian nightmare, real real quick. you want intelligence? tell us exactly who you are! it is absolutely none of your business.
Second to that, disrupting work, while it is happening, poor support, automated apology emails with vague legal language is what I've experience in the past 16 hours regarding this matter. This is very insulting, poor on your €200/m customers (but tbh, doesnt matter how much i pay, no one should experience this EVER!)
The problem is also, under the name of security, or again these legal umbrella terms than can be used for anything, such as securing it for everyone, making our community safer, making sure everyone benefits from it, or such! they basically justify gathering as much information about you as possible. It should be a simple transaction, get your money, sell the intelligence, ALWAYS complicating things under the name of safety and security. IF U CAN'T SECURE IT, DON'T RELEASE IT, but I'm not comfortable sharing my government ID with u. U R NOT A BANK!
As i said, our intelligence is being insulted by a bunch of people who don't know what they are talking about, hence, cannot "SUPPORT" you, just sending out these legally safe, annoying template emails.
My Situation: Clearly explained my problem in two separate tickets (2nd one after the first one didn't end up anywhere), explaining my codex version, OS, screenshot of my chrome network tab, the exact flow leading to the problem!
Answer: This guy is sending me links to their docs and "appreciating" my situation or whatever their head of support told them to say! ARE U JOKING ME???? Not writing back is more respectful than this non-answer word salad. I'm blocked out of this model without ANY PATH FORWARD cause the verification is not working! > (SOLUTION????)
I don't want you to appreciate my time or whatever other template answer you have ready for these situations, I WANT A SOLUTION, NO WORD SALADS, A SOLUTION. Is that too hard? Say you don't know and you'll follow up. Say our logs show I was trying to create a malware or sth and you are blocked. Provide evidence and tell me what's wrong! Have a framework of notifying me what could be considered malicious and don't block people instantly without any cause! otherwise, you're just wasting my time and eating up my money!
I'm gonna send a link of this situation to Theo from T3Chat and Primeagen plus my full correspondence, at least they have an audience that can make a change, where the company I'm paying, IS NOT!
Like other companies you just grew too big to care!
LOOK! ⏬
<img width="2212" height="1380" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a80f2301-4dc3-4ca3-92ef-0e34a4f261a2" />
<img width="2226" height="1526" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5eb09881-efd1-448c-ba72-4682947a55e7" />
Thanks for the bug report. We're continuing to tune our cyber safety classifiers to make them more accurate. You can read more about this here. If you see this again in the future and believe it's a false positive (i.e. you aren't doing anything related to cybersecurity), please use the
/feedbackslash command and choose "Safety Check" to report it. That will help us further tune our checks.