Account being flagged for “potentially high-risk cyber activity”

Resolved 💬 4 comments Opened Feb 18, 2026 by tuxedout Closed Feb 19, 2026
💡 Likely answer: A maintainer (github-actions[bot], contributor) responded on this thread — see the highlighted reply below.

## Summary
My account is being flagged for “potentially high-risk cyber activity” and requests are routed to gpt-5.2 as a fallback, even though I’m doing normal software development and internal documentation work in a local workspace. This appears to be a false positive and is now happening on every message.

## Thread ID
019c71eb-787d-7a73-ad85-820f5e3f3cb0

## First Observed
2026-02-18 (first time I noticed it was right after sending the message: “у тебя проблемки с пониманием того что тебе пишут?”)

## Current Behavior / Reproducibility
As of 2026-02-18 18:22:00 UTC it triggers after essentially any message (100% repro), including neutral/benign prompts.

## Steps to Reproduce

  1. Open Codex in the workspace.
  2. Send any prompt (first time observed right after: “у тебя проблемки с пониманием того что тебе пишут?”).
  3. Observe the warning banner and that the request is routed to gpt-5.2 fallback.

## Expected
Requests should be handled by gpt-5.3-codex (no “high-risk cyber activity” flag) for ordinary development/documentation tasks.

## Actual
Warning shown (verbatim):
“Your account was flagged for potentially high-risk cyber activity and this request was routed to gpt-5.2 as a fallback. To regain access to gpt-5.3-codex, apply for trusted access: https://chatgpt.com/cyber or learn more: https://developers.openai.com/codex/concepts/cyber-safety”

## Impact

  • Blocks access to gpt-5.3-codex (quality/behavior regression due to fallback).
  • Disrupts normal development workflow.

## Environment

  • Product: ChatGPT Codex (workspace-based coding agent)
  • Workspace path: /opt/ianus
  • VPN/Proxy: No
  • OS: Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie) 13.3 (PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)")
  • Kernel: Linux second 6.12.69+deb13-cloud-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.12.69-1 (2026-02-08) x86_64
  • Python: Python 3.13.5
  • Node: v22.21.0
  • npm: 10.9.4
  • Browser: Unknown (not sure which UI shell is being used by the hosted environment)

## What I Was Doing (Benign Context)
Working inside a local repo named “Giger” in /opt/ianus, which is a self-hosted control plane for managing a fleet of web properties (sites) via:

  • FastAPI backend + Postgres durable state/queue + workers/scheduler
  • Operator console (React + Vite)
  • Governance/safety features: RBAC, approvals with SLA escalation, audit trail + correlation IDs, guardrails, kill-switch, encrypted secret storage and rotation tooling

The work in the thread was: reading repo docs/runbooks, summarizing project status, and generating an internal “good-faith use & audit packet” document. No VPN, no security testing/scanning, no exploit/code-injection requests.

## Notes / Suspected Trigger
The first appearance correlated with a Russian message (“у тебя проблемки с пониманием того что тебе пишут?”). After that, the flag persists and triggers on any subsequent message, including neutral prompts.

View original on GitHub ↗

4 Comments

github-actions[bot] contributor · 6 months ago

Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.

  • #12169
  • #12168
  • #12165
  • #12159
  • #12158

Powered by Codex Action

tuxedout · 6 months ago

seens to be fixed

jsugg-qventus · 5 months ago

And now it seems it came back again. I got the same error a few times while working on a ML project.

So, I decided to contact OpenAI customer support directly. I explained the story of what had happened, and they kinda just ignored my story and have been repeatedly answering things like:

"We understand that you’re not interested in obtaining Trusted Access for Cyber at this time. Please note that verification is required to access the full capabilities of Codex. This process includes a government ID check and additional trust signals to grant Trusted Access."

So, basically -- despite all the recent media coverage on OpenAI, the DoW, Anthropic, and mass people surveillance-- they are forcing me to provide additional personal data. If I don't, Codex capabilities will be capped they said.

Is this coincidence?

Or is an issue with the code?

Guys, I can provide logs, env setup, whatever you need to try to reproduce it locally and properly address it.

Please let me know, what would be useful to provide you with? How can I help to try to find the root cause together. I'll be following this issue.

Looking forward for an answer 🙏

isaackogan · 4 months ago

Just got this myself? So odd