Clarity on the "Simple Codex" harness in Terminal Bench 2.0?

Resolved 💬 4 comments Opened Feb 19, 2026 by cpacker Closed Feb 19, 2026
💡 Likely answer: A maintainer (etraut-openai, contributor) responded on this thread — see the highlighted reply below.

What is the type of issue?

Documentation is missing

What is the issue?

Is there any public information on what exactly the "Simple Codex" harness is? As of Feb 18, 2026, it's the top of the leaderboard by a significant margin, and since the Codex CLI is open source, it would be nice to know what configuration is being used to achieve these scores, since presumably this should be correlated to getting the most out of Codex (the model + harness) as a developer / end-user.

Is it just the default Codex CLI harness (headless) for GPT-5.3 Codex, but with certain interactive tools (ask user question, etc) dropped?

X-posted to the T-bench repo in case that's a better spot for this discussion: https://github.com/laude-institute/terminal-bench/issues/1417

<img width="1296" height="755" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3664ac38-96b4-4f4d-aa84-a8b420f9ebd2" />

Where did you find it?

https://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0

View original on GitHub ↗

4 Comments

etraut-openai contributor · 6 months ago

To my knowledge, this report isn't something we publish or have an affiliation with. You'd need to ask the people who publish this leaderboard.

cpacker · 6 months ago

@etraut-openai do you mean that the Codex CLI research/engineering team is not affiliated with the team that wrote the release blog on GPT-5.3 Codex? Just trying to understand what the relationship between the OSS and leaderboard score is (sounds like it's unrelated teams?)

<img width="669" height="215" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a2f7e03a-510f-46ac-b23a-e66a661af6fc" />

https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-3-codex/

cpacker · 6 months ago

(thanks for the quick reply btw)

etraut-openai contributor · 6 months ago

Ah, I misinterpreted your question. I don't know the answer here. I'm going to convert this to a discussion since it's not a bug or feature request.