Suggestion: add an optional troubleshooting reference for context, retrieval, and multi-step agent workflow failures

Resolved 💬 0 comments Opened Mar 3, 2026 by onestardao Closed Mar 3, 2026

Hi, I’d like to suggest a small docs-oriented addition that may be useful as an optional external troubleshooting reference for users working with Codex in real-world agentic coding workflows.

The resource is the WFGY RAG 16 Problem Map, a framework-agnostic troubleshooting checklist for diagnosing common downstream failure patterns in retrieval-heavy and context-dependent LLM systems.

While Codex itself is a coding agent, many real usage patterns around terminal-based coding agents eventually involve:

  • codebase-scale context drift
  • retrieval of the wrong local context or file region
  • stale or conflicting context across multi-step tasks
  • answer inconsistency after long agent loops
  • tool / instruction path confusion
  • reasoning breakdowns across chained edits, commands, and follow-up steps

Reference:
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/blob/main/ProblemMap/README.md

I am not suggesting this as a Codex-specific standard or core design change.
Rather, I think it may be useful as an optional companion reference for users who want a more structured way to classify downstream failures once the agent is already functioning but the workflow output becomes unreliable.

This resource has already been referenced or integrated by multiple public RAG / LLM ecosystem projects, including:

  • RAGFlow
  • LlamaIndex
  • ToolUniverse (Harvard MIMS Lab)
  • Rankify
  • Multimodal RAG Survey (QCRI LLM Lab)

If this seems relevant, I’d be happy to open a very small docs-only PR with:

  • a one-line description
  • a minimal link entry
  • wording adapted to the style of this repository

Thanks for your time.

View original on GitHub ↗