Are you dense? Put 5.4 Thinking and Pro on Codex connected to our subscription your marketing is deceiving.

Resolved 💬 4 comments Opened Apr 2, 2026 by topemalheiro Closed Apr 2, 2026
💡 Likely answer: A maintainer (github-actions[bot], contributor) responded on this thread — see the highlighted reply below.

What variant of Codex are you using?

Doesn't matter

What feature would you like to see?

...

Additional information

If I knew we only get access to them in ChatGPT web/app, I would've never subscribed. Your marketing should be clear, or you gotta put that there like yesterday, I'm thinking about refunding now.

_No response_

View original on GitHub ↗

4 Comments

github-actions[bot] contributor · 4 months ago

Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.

  • #16610
  • #16261
  • #16453
  • #15648

Powered by Codex Action

topemalheiro · 4 months ago

Look at what I gotta do just to code with your best models properly: https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1rlqsj9/imagine_gpt_54_pro_on_codex/
Have the decency and professionalism to facilitate the programmers that buy your product, smh.

etraut-openai contributor · 4 months ago

The Pro model is not designed to be used for agentic or coding use cases. It's intended for deep research.

For a detailed list of OpenAI models that are supported in Codex, refer to this documentation.

topemalheiro · 4 months ago
The Pro model is not designed to be used for agentic or coding use cases. It's intended for deep research. For a detailed list of OpenAI models that are supported in Codex, refer to this documentation.

Wow, a reply from an AI company. Thanks!