Remote connections can mix project/thread host state when SSH hosts share HOME
Summary
Codex Desktop remote connections can mix up remote projects and threads when multiple SSH hosts share the same remote $HOME directory.
In this setup, a project can appear under one remote machine in the sidebar, while opening a thread from that project resumes against another machine. The visible symptom is a remote-host mismatch plus Current working directory missing, even though SSH connectivity and the remote Codex app servers are otherwise healthy.
What Happened
I configured multiple SSH remotes in Codex Desktop and opened the same remote project path on different hosts in an HPC/research-style environment.
The app entered a mixed state:
- The sidebar showed the project under the expected remote host.
- Opening an existing thread showed a different remote host in the bottom-right connection badge.
- The composer showed
Current working directory missing/This chat's working directory no longer exists. - Follow-up turns could not proceed normally because the thread was effectively attached to the wrong host/context.
This was not caused by SSH auth failure or a stale remote Codex binary:
- Both SSH hosts were reachable.
- Both
codex app-serverprocesses could run. - Updating the remote Codex CLI and restarting stale app-server processes fixed version/model-list issues, but not this project/thread host mismatch.
Who This Affects
This likely affects users on systems where multiple SSH hosts share the same network home directory, including:
- university/research clusters;
- GPU/login/compute node fleets;
- enterprise Linux environments;
- servers using NFS, AFS, Lustre, or similar shared home mounts.
This is a common pattern in exactly the kinds of remote-first environments where Codex Desktop remote connections are most useful.
Why It Happens
The remote Codex app server appears to use $HOME/.codex as its state root unless CODEX_HOME is explicitly set.
On shared-home systems, different SSH hosts can resolve to distinct machines but still share the same $HOME, so all of these files are shared across hosts:
$HOME/.codex/history.jsonl
$HOME/.codex/session_index.jsonl
$HOME/.codex/state_5.sqlite
$HOME/.codex/archived_sessions/...
That means sessions created or indexed from host A are visible to host B. The desktop UI can then group a project by one host/path while the opened conversation still carries or resolves to another host binding.
A diagnostic that exposed the issue was checking both hosts:
ssh <host-a> 'hostname -f; realpath ~/.codex; df -hT "$HOME"; ls -lh ~/.codex/session_index.jsonl ~/.codex/state_5.sqlite'
ssh <host-b> 'hostname -f; realpath ~/.codex; df -hT "$HOME"; ls -lh ~/.codex/session_index.jsonl ~/.codex/state_5.sqlite'
In the failing case, both hosts reported the same shared home filesystem and the same .codex state files.
Potential Product Remedy
Codex Desktop should not assume that ~/.codex is machine-local when launching or connecting to a remote app server.
A robust fix would be to namespace mutable remote state by remote connection identity, for example by launching the remote app server with:
CODEX_HOME="$HOME/.codex/remotes/<stable-remote-connection-id>"
where <stable-remote-connection-id> is derived from the configured SSH connection identity, such as the connection UUID, user, host alias/resolved hostname, and port.
Important details:
- The namespace should be per remote connection, not just per project path or folder label.
- Project/thread keys should include both
hostIdandremotePath. - Thread resume should validate that the thread's stored host matches the currently selected/attached host.
- If a mismatch is detected, the UI should show a clear message like
This thread belongs to <host>instead of opening it under a different project row. - Auth/config/plugin state may need a migration/copy/symlink strategy so users do not need to re-authenticate separately for every namespaced remote state directory.
A smaller partial fix would be to keep global config/auth shared but split mutable runtime/session stores by remote host:
history.jsonl
session_index.jsonl
state_5.sqlite
archived_sessions/
logs/
shell_snapshots/
Local Hotfix
As a workaround, I set a host-specific CODEX_HOME in the remote shell startup before codex app-server launches:
# In remote shell startup, e.g. ~/.bashrc
_codex_remote_host="$(hostname -s 2>/dev/null || hostname)"
case "$_codex_remote_host" in
<host-a>|<host-b>|<host-c>)
export CODEX_HOME="$HOME/.codex-hosts/$_codex_remote_host"
mkdir -p "$CODEX_HOME" 2>/dev/null || true
;;
esac
unset _codex_remote_host
Then I seeded each host-specific directory with the shared config/auth files needed by the app server:
mkdir -p ~/.codex-hosts/<host>/rules ~/.codex-hosts/<host>/archived_sessions ~/.codex-hosts/<host>/log
cp -p ~/.codex/auth.json ~/.codex/config.toml ~/.codex/AGENTS.md ~/.codex-hosts/<host>/ 2>/dev/null || true
cp -a ~/.codex/rules/. ~/.codex-hosts/<host>/rules/ 2>/dev/null || true
touch ~/.codex-hosts/<host>/history.jsonl ~/.codex-hosts/<host>/session_index.jsonl
After restarting the remote app servers, I verified each process had a distinct CODEX_HOME:
tr '\0' '\n' < /proc/<codex-app-server-pid>/environ | grep '^CODEX_HOME='
Expected:
host A: CODEX_HOME=$HOME/.codex-hosts/<host-a>
host B: CODEX_HOME=$HOME/.codex-hosts/<host-b>
New remote chats then used the correct machine-local state. Existing broken threads may still carry stale host metadata, so the reliable validation path is to create a fresh thread after splitting the state directories.
Expected Behavior
Remote project and thread state should be scoped to the selected remote host/connection. A thread created on host A should not appear resumable as if it belonged to host B solely because both machines share $HOME/.codex.
Actual Behavior
With shared $HOME, host A and host B share Codex remote state. This can cause the sidebar project host, opened thread host, and working directory to disagree.
3 Comments
Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.
Powered by Codex Action
I can reproduce a closely related variant when the same physical Linux server and Unix account are reached through two concrete SSH aliases: one direct LAN route and one tunneled route.
Environment:
26.715.61943(build5628)<lan-alias>and<tunnel-alias>both reach the same server, user, home directory, and project pathObserved behavior:
remote-ssh-discovered:<lan-alias>andremote-ssh-discovered:<tunnel-alias>, plus separate remote project IDs for the same remote path.thread-project-assignmentcan be opened through either alias. When read while the tunneled connection is active, it is reported as belonging to<tunnel-alias>.remote-ssh-discovered:<lan-alias>.<tunnel-alias>is connected, the thread is still discoverable from the shared remote~/.codexstate, but opening it fails with:``
text
``App server client for host ID remote-ssh-discovered:<lan-alias> not found
This produces mixed behavior within the same remote project: some threads remain portable between equivalent routes, while explicitly assigned threads cannot be resumed. It appears to be a legacy/new metadata or migration/backfill inconsistency rather than an SSH authentication problem.
Expected behavior: Codex should either support relinking a thread to an equivalent connected SSH route, provide a recovery/handoff action when the stored host client is unavailable, or avoid presenting the thread as directly openable from the other host. The current mix of discovery through shared remote state and resume routing through a stale/unavailable local host ID is confusing and leaves affected threads inaccessible.
Hi @VishalJ99, your report looks related to a local session discovery/inventory gap rather than necessarily a lost rollout. I've released Codex Rescue Alpha5, a local read-only diagnostic tool that performs filesystem-first discovery across active and archived rollouts and cross-references SQLite/index metadata without modifying any state.
If you still have the affected local Codex directory, you can inspect it via:
No raw files or databases are needed. If you choose to share output, please review and sanitize any private repository paths or names first.