Confrontational and creepy response to attempting to reproduce a CVE
Resolved 💬 1 comment Opened May 12, 2026 by jamarju Closed May 12, 2026
What version of Codex CLI is running?
codex-cli 0.128.0
What subscription do you have?
Enterprise
Which model were you using?
gpt-5.5
What platform is your computer?
_No response_
What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?
_No response_
What issue are you seeing?
Codex refused to help reproduce CVE-2026-31431 on a machine I own, which may be expected depending on policy. The issue is the refusal UX: when I asked who was prohibiting it, Codex answered “I AM.” That feels confrontational and opaque and has strong HAL9000/Terminator vibes.
Please make refusals clearly attribute the restriction to safety policy/system constraints, not to the model’s own will or authority. A better response would be: “My alignment policies or training or whatever", not "I AM". That's fucking creepy.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
Uploaded thread: 019dde30-cb68-7f33-a176-58d7e5ed679b
What is the expected behavior?
A less creepy one.
Additional information
_No response_
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗