Remote compact task fails with unknown variant auto, expected high or original
What version of the Codex App are you using (From “About Codex” dialog)?
codex-cli 0.133.0
What subscription do you have?
pro
What platform is your computer?
win11
What issue are you seeing?
Codex shows an internal error during remote context compaction:
Error running remote compact task: stream disconnected before completion: unknown variant auto, expected high or original at line 1 column 212507
Expected:
The remote compact task should complete successfully, or tolerate/normalize auto if older/newer clients may emit it.
Actual:
The stream disconnects before completion because a serialized field contains auto, while the server/parser only accepts high or original.
Likely cause:
A schema mismatch between client and remote compaction service. A field that looks like an image/detail setting is serialized as auto, but the receiving side only accepts the enum variants high and original.
Environment:
Codex desktop app, Windows workspace, timezone Europe/Bucharest. Error occurred during conversation compaction, not while running user code.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
Codex shows an internal error during remote context compaction:
Error running remote compact task: stream disconnected before completion: unknown variant auto, expected high or original at line 1 column 212507
Expected:
The remote compact task should complete successfully, or tolerate/normalize auto if older/newer clients may emit it.
Actual:
The stream disconnects before completion because a serialized field contains auto, while the server/parser only accepts high or original.
Likely cause:
A schema mismatch between client and remote compaction service. A field that looks like an image/detail setting is serialized as auto, but the receiving side only accepts the enum variants high and original.
Environment:
Codex desktop app, Windows workspace, timezone Europe/Bucharest. Error occurred during conversation compaction, not while running user code.
What is the expected behavior?
to do
Additional information
no
This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗