The limits went from 77% to 0 in one minute
Open 💬 9 comments Opened Jun 3, 2026 by arisnachy
💡 Likely answer: A maintainer (github-actions[bot], contributor)
responded on this thread — see the highlighted reply below.
What version of the Codex App are you using (From “About Codex” dialog)?
26.601.21317
What subscription do you have?
plus(con un bono de 10x hasta el dia 5 de junio)
What platform is your computer?
windows
What issue are you seeing?
BUG CRÍTICO / URGENTE
El sistema mostró un cambio anómalo de rendimiento/porcentaje: pasó de 77% a 0% en aproximadamente 1 minuto.
Contexto:
- Antes del error el sistema marcaba 77%.
- En menos de un minuto bajó a 0%.
- Yo había ganado un bono de 10X.
- Ese bono vence el día 5 de junio.
- No entiendo por qué ocurrió el cambio; parece un error de cálculo, sincronización, cache, estado o actualización incorrecta de datos.
Objetivo:
Investigar y corregir la causa exacta por la cual el porcentaje bajó de 77% a 0% de forma repentina.
Codex debe hacer lo siguiente:
- Revisar toda la lógica donde se calcula el porcentaje/rendimiento.
- Revisar si el valor 0 se está asignando por defecto cuando:
- falta una respuesta del backend,
- falla una API,
- se limpia el estado,
- se reinicia el componente,
- hay datos incompletos,
- expira un cálculo temporal,
- hay error de parsing,
- se recibe null/undefined/NaN.
- Revisar si hubo una actualización automática, cron job, polling, refresh o listener que sobrescribió el 77% con 0%.
- Revisar la lógica del bono 10X y su fecha de vencimiento del 5 de junio.
- Verificar si el bono fue marcado incorrectamente como expirado, inválido, usado o reseteado.
- Revisar logs del frontend y backend alrededor del minuto exacto en que ocurrió el cambio.
- Agregar protección para que el sistema nunca cambie de 77% a 0% sin una causa real validada.
- Si falta data temporalmente, debe mostrar “calculando”, “sin conexión” o “datos pendientes”, pero NO debe poner 0%.
- Crear logs/auditoría para guardar:
- valor anterior,
- valor nuevo,
- timestamp,
- fuente del cambio,
- función que hizo el update,
- usuario afectado,
- estado del bono.
- Corregir el bug sin romper el resto del sistema.
Regla importante:
No asumir que el 0% es correcto. Debe tratarse como posible bug hasta demostrar lo contrario con datos reales.
Resultado esperado:
- Identificar exactamente qué función o proceso cambió el valor de 77% a 0%.
- Corregir la causa.
- Restaurar o recalcular correctamente el porcentaje.
- Confirmar que el bono 10X sigue válido hasta el 5 de junio si no ha expirado realmente.
- Agregar validaciones para evitar que vuelva a ocurrir.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
Feedback ID: no-active-thread-019e8f62-afd7-7231-8bf1-c642ba8a0cab
What is the expected behavior?
deberia haber teniado aun 77% semanal
Additional information
_No response_
9 Comments
Was about to post the same, everything still seems to be working but everything is showing 0% or
<img width="591" height="89" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3ba82c22-d706-4472-9926-422fbe1c8aee" />
si me ha pasado igual que tu veo el mensaje pero veo el sistema funcionando
One triage detail that may be useful: the screenshots/comments suggest this might be a display/accounting-state problem rather than actual exhaustion, because at least one user reports the app still works while the UI shows
0%.If that is accurate, the main thing I would check is whether the rate-limit UI collapses an unavailable/failed/partial usage response into a real zero value. A safer behavior would be to distinguish these states explicitly:
0%only when the backend returns a valid exhausted quota snapshot;Unavailable,Refreshing, or similar, and keep the last known value visually marked stale;That would make this much easier to debug from user reports: “0% because exhausted” is a very different state from “usage snapshot failed or bonus entitlement could not be resolved.”
Yes, that matches what I’m seeing as well. Several users have now reported the same behavior, so this does not appear to be an isolated account-level issue.
In my case, the percentage dropped from around
77%to0%within about a minute, even though I had an active10Xbonus that should remain valid until June 5. Other users are also reporting similar sudden drops, and some say the app still works while the UI shows0%.That makes me think this may be a usage display/accounting-state bug rather than true quota exhaustion.
I agree that the key thing to investigate is whether the rate-limit UI is treating an unavailable, failed, partial, or stale usage response as a real zero value. The system should only show
0%when the backend confirms a valid exhausted quota snapshot. Otherwise, it should show something likeUnavailable,Refreshing, or keep the last known value marked as stale.It would also help if bonus/promotion entitlement were displayed separately from the weekly usage percentage, including the source, status, and expiry date. Right now, it is very hard for users to know whether
0%means actual exhaustion or simply that the usage snapshot or bonus entitlement failed to resolve.Now nothing is working at all and it's saying I'm out of usage. Had something like 51% of the week left
<img width="757" height="93" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dca584aa-5f2f-414a-a46e-af82e19d8210" />
Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.
Powered by Codex Action
Aaaand we're back? Okay then. Thanks
Ya resuelto el problema
English translation:
What version of the Codex App are you using (From “About Codex” dialog)?
26.601.21317
What subscription do you have?
plus (with a 10x bonus until June 5)
What platform is your computer?
windows
What issue are you seeing?
CRITICAL / URGENT BUG
The system showed an abnormal change in performance/percentage: it went from 77% to 0% in approximately 1 minute.
Context:
Objective:
Investigate and fix the exact cause of the percentage suddenly dropping from 77% to 0%.
Codex must do the following:
Important rule:
Do not assume that 0% is correct. It must be treated as a possible bug until proven otherwise with real data.
Expected result:
What steps can reproduce the bug?
Feedback ID: no-active-thread-019e8f62-afd7-7231-8bf1-c642ba8a0cab
What is the expected behavior?
I should still have had 77% of my weekly usage remaining
Additional information
_No response_
<!-- codex-issue-translator -->