Windows Codex App: apply_patch fails because codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exe cannot launch from package path
What version of the Codex App are you using (From “About Codex” dialog)?
26.616.3767.0
What subscription do you have?
Redacted / not included
What platform is your computer?
Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.19045.0 x64
What issue are you seeing?
Summary
On Windows, every apply_patch call in the Codex desktop app fails, even for a normal temporary file inside the workspace. The failure is reproducible and is not related to patch content or the target file.
Observed Codex error
apply_patch verification failed: Failed to read file to update <workspace>\.tmp-apply-patch-diagnostic.txt: fs sandbox helper failed with status exit code: 1: windows sandbox failed: orchestrator_helper_launch_canceled: ShellExecuteExW failed to launch setup helper: 1223
Observed Windows dialog
C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\OpenAI.Codex_26.616.3767.0_x64__2p2nqsd0c76g0\app\resources\codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exe
The specified module could not be found.
What has already been verified
- The helper file exists at the package path.
- Restarting Codex does not fix the problem.
- Reinstalling Codex does not fix the problem.
- Normal shell read/write in the workspace still works.
apply_patchfails for any target file, not just one specific repository file.- Launching the helper directly from the package path is blocked by package ACLs, but copying the exact same binary to a normal workspace path allows it to start and print argument parsing errors.
- The copied helper has the same SHA256 hash as the packaged helper.
Important observation
Copying codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exe out of C:\Program Files\WindowsApps to a normal writable path allows it to run. For example, running the copied binary without arguments prints:
Error: helper_request_args_failed: expected payload argument
This suggests the helper binary itself is not generally broken and does not have a universal missing-DLL problem. The issue appears to happen specifically when Codex launches the helper from the packaged WindowsApps / AppContainer context.
Chinese version
在 Windows 上,Codex 桌面版中的所有 apply_patch 调用都会失败,即使目标只是工作区里的一个普通临时文件。这个问题可以稳定复现,和补丁内容或目标文件本身无关。
已观察到的 Codex 错误:
apply_patch verification failed: Failed to read file to update <workspace>\.tmp-apply-patch-diagnostic.txt: fs sandbox helper failed with status exit code: 1: windows sandbox failed: orchestrator_helper_launch_canceled: ShellExecuteExW failed to launch setup helper: 1223
Windows 弹窗:
C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\OpenAI.Codex_26.616.3767.0_x64__2p2nqsd0c76g0\app\resources\codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exe
找不到指定的模块。
已确认:
- helper 文件本体存在。
- 重启 Codex 无法修复。
- 重装 Codex 无法修复。
- 普通 shell 对工作区文件的读写正常。
apply_patch对任意文件都失败,不是某个仓库文件的个例。- 直接从包路径启动 helper 会被包权限限制,但把同一个二进制复制到普通工作区路径后可以正常启动,并输出参数解析错误。
- 复制后的 helper 与包内 helper 的 SHA256 完全一致。
关键信息:把 codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exe 从 C:\Program Files\WindowsApps 复制到普通可写路径后,它是可以运行的,例如无参数运行会输出:
Error: helper_request_args_failed: expected payload argument
这说明 helper 二进制本体并没有普遍性损坏,也不像是一个通用的缺 DLL 问题。问题更像发生在 Codex 从 WindowsApps / AppContainer 上下文中启动该 helper 的这条集成链路上。
What steps can reproduce the bug?
- Open Codex desktop app on Windows.
- In any workspace, invoke
apply_patchon a normal file, including a temporary text file. - Observe that the tool fails immediately before patch application.
- A Windows dialog may appear referencing
codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exeand saying that the specified module could not be found.
Minimal reproduction target used during debugging:
.tmp-apply-patch-diagnostic.txt
Anonymous reproduction notes:
- Personal account identifiers removed
- Local workspace path redacted in the main error excerpt
What is the expected behavior?
apply_patch should be able to edit normal workspace files successfully. If the helper cannot be launched from the packaged environment, Codex should either recover gracefully or provide a more actionable error that identifies the exact failing dependency or launch condition.
Additional information
Likely scope based on local investigation:
- The helper binary itself can run when copied outside the package path.
- The failure appears specific to the packaged WindowsApps / AppContainer launch path.
- This may point to helper launch integration, working directory or environment setup, or package-context resource resolution rather than a corrupted helper binary.
Potential developer debugging directions:
- Check the exact helper launch parameters and working directory used by the app
- Check whether the helper depends on relative resources when launched from the package
- Trace file and DLL lookups during helper startup from the packaged environment
46 Comments
Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.
Powered by Codex Action
They aren't duplicates since the https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/28982 is pointing to the 26.616.3309.0 version, but the newest 26.616.3767.0 still have this issue. Here is my comment about the current app version https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/28982#issuecomment-4750312054
I experience the same issue since yesterday, but the popup Windows error is different: COM HRESULT 0x80110474: “COM+ registry database detected a system error.
@eliotcougar I think you need to create a new issue, because this issue is about specific
apply_patcherror<img width="1140" height="404" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/016ccc4f-f042-4a23-9bcc-3201f92b35e5" />
Update after installing Codex Windows app 26.616.4196.0:
The issue still reproduces on my machine.
I used
/feedbackin all chats where I have this error. Feedback IDs:019edf2b-4a04-7490-9fd0-2fd746beb640019eb0d0-55a8-7b71-95c5-1167902c4a60019e9e55-653c-7410-8d93-92c98e2311c9019edf2b-4a04-7490-9fd0-2fd746beb640<img width="561" height="198" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/76e84ffb-ae60-4099-aa9b-f3f6b952e677" />
Still reproducible after updating to Codex App 26.616.4196.0.
The Windows dialog still reports:
codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exe
"The specified module could not be found."
Normal shell commands work, but apply_patch hangs/fails.
See if you have
"proxy_ports": []array set to anything other than empty in.codex\.sandbox\setup_marker.json.In my case, setting it to empty fixed very similar apply_patch failures that started happening after update to 26.616
One caveat: I have a proxy set in
.codex\.envand every time Codex runs any elevated shell command, the port gets added back tosetup_marker.jsonand apply_patch stops working again._The solution was found by Codex after about 30 minutes of investigating its own failures on extra-high._
@eliotcougar
This is just crazy, because I also spent 2% of my limit tracking this problem.
In my file, the port was set to 2080 (the default port for the Throne app), and I can confirm that removing it helps, but it's required for the Codex mobile app to work due to my specific network setup. Everything worked fine before, so this is a bug that OpenAI needs to fix.
You are right.This is because of .codex/.env
Based on the current evidence, this issue appears to be related to a state mismatch in the Windows elevated sandbox setup after recent Codex updates.
In my environment, Codex uses a configured proxy and the Windows sandbox state file records a proxy port in its stored sandbox setup marker. However, the newer Codex runtime appears to sometimes compute the desired proxy port list as empty. As a result, the sandbox repeatedly detects an offline firewall configuration mismatch, with logs showing a pattern like:
offline firewall settings changed (stored_ports=[...], desired_ports=[])
After that, Codex repeatedly attempts to refresh or relaunch the Windows sandbox setup helper. In the affected versions, this elevated helper launch path can fail with:
ShellExecuteExW failed to launch setup helper: 1223
and may also trigger a Windows popup for codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exe saying that the specified module could not be found.
This would explain why normal shell file operations may still work, why apply_patch can sometimes create a file successfully, and why later edit/delete operations fail. It also explains why the issue can appear after an update without any project-level configuration change.
So my current hypothesis is:
Adding another Windows data point that may connect this issue with #25488.
On my machine,
apply_patchwas failing while normal shell read/write in the workspace still worked. The important difference from the original report is that my config had an old workaround from thenode_repl/ Computer Use sandbox failure class:With that setting active,
apply_patchcould create a new file, but update/delete operations on existing files failed with:I then changed the Windows sandbox setting to the elevated path and fully restarted Codex:
After restart, the same sandbox probe passed:
apply_patchupdate on an existing file succeededapply_patchdelete succeededapply_patchadd succeededSo this may be a separate failure path from the package-path helper launch error in the issue description, but it produces the same user-visible pattern: shell filesystem operations work, while
apply_patchfails. The connection to #25488 is thatsandbox = "unelevated"was previously useful as a workaround for Windows sandbox setup / Computer Use failures, but it can breakapply_patchin workspace-write sessions with multiple writable roots.@codex Same here, quite annoying. Please fix this bug.
feedback ID :
019eee8f-25da-76c3-b940-fca1e4de3de1Removing "proxy_ports" in setup_marker.json and "http.proxy" in VS code settings solved for me, at least, still valid after several runs.
I hit the same
codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exe/The specified module could not be foundissue on Windows.A workaround that fixed
apply_patchfor me was switching the native Windows sandbox fromelevatedtounelevatedin the Codex config:same on me , after vscode codex extension updated to 26.616 it appears to show everytime apply_patch
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
Additional reproduction and local diagnostics (privacy-sanitized):
Environment
26.623.5546.0(the issue still reproduces on this newer build)26200sandbox_mode = "workspace-write"approval_policy = "on-request"[windows] sandbox = "elevated"Observed failure
Windows repeatedly shows a modal dialog for the packaged
codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exesaying:Trigger pattern
setup refresh: processed ...; errors=[]entries on the same day, while the failingShellExecuteExWattempts were absent from that sandbox log. This suggests those attempts fail before the helper starts and can log for itself.setup refresh: spawning ...entries, which may indicate concurrent refresh attempts.Local checks completed
OpenAI OpCo, LLC.2FD812AC28D942461640B7251BF566A7960433253274119CDC9709CF25FDA5E7.Appinfoservice is running normally.Current assessment
This looks more like an intermittent race or packaged-launch/context problem in the elevated sandbox setup-refresh orchestration than a missing helper binary, corrupted installation, universal missing DLL, or local security-product block. Reinstalling runtime components or changing package ACLs does not appear justified by the evidence.
It would help if the app could serialize/deduplicate concurrent setup refreshes, capture the precise loader/module failure before returning
1223, retry without showing repeated modal dialogs, and log failures in the outer orchestrator when the helper never starts.No personal paths, usernames, account identifiers, conversation data, or raw logs are included in this report.
I've solved by trying this post on my machine -> https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1uccr76/comment/otvxpcs/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
@NoNormalCreeper it worked for me, thanks a lot! So it were proxy vars!
+1. this error only occurs when apply_patch
@NoNormalCreeper sadly this keeps happening for me :(
+1 I hope OpenAI team gives Windows user a little bit more attention
Have you tried the method in the thread below my post? This also seems useful. (temp fix)
this is merely a fix, keeping the sandbox as elevated is ultimately the goal
Judging by some of the commits, I believe the fix is prepared to be included in 0.143.0, but for some reason they're not releasing it yet… Probably will be released together with 5.6...
The better temporary workaround is to add
to the config.toml
But that means shell commands like curl won't use proxy. At least apply_patch will work, though…
You may try instructing Codex to append proxy envs before any shell requests that require network access. In my testing it makes elevated shell commands run with proxy without causing apply_patch to fail afterwards…
This proxy-exclude setup works for me! Here's my summarized workaround solution:
https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/30009#issuecomment-4863258508
thanks
alright that may sound stupid but here's what fixed the issue on my end :
i didn't wanted to disable the elevated sandbox. furthermore, the
shell_environment_policy.excludeworkaround didn't work for me, probably because it doesn't exist.i just ended up disabling
features.network_proxyand emptying one last timeproxy_portsin thesetup_marker.json, and that fixed it.network_proxyis an experimental feature anyway and idk why it seemed to be enabled by default in my config while it shouldn't had (i probably messed up with the/experimentalcommand and thought to myself like a dumbass "oh yeah surely this is cool"). after reading its doc i don't think i have any use case for it personally so better keep it offWhat do you mean it doesn't exist? It's right there in the table you linked. And btw, you need to clear the proxy port from the
setup_marker.jsonmanually after you add the exclude setting. That's what actually helped your case, probably.my bad, I looked at network_proxy.exclude lol
I did indeed had all config keys setup properly and did clean the array but after any tool call (like apply_patch) it would be filled right back
here is my test:
windows codex cli, since version v0.140.0 to latest(2026-7-7). if sandbox='evleated', apply_patch will fail and popup that sandbox error window.
If you don't want to take the risk of unelevated sandbox setting,
temp solution: roll back to v0.139.0.
modify ".codex\config.toml",change sandbox = "elevated" to "unelevated",this may help
The update to 26.623.141536 was supposed to fix this, but it didn't. However, in my case the COM+ crash disappeared on one machine, but it kept crashing on another machine. So, I looked to see what was different...
sandbox = "elevated"sandbox_mode = "workspace-write"sandbox_workspace_write.network_access = truehttp_proxyandhttps_proxyenv variables presentshell_environment_policy.excludeworkaround removedHere's what helped:
sandbox_workspace_write.network_access = trueAfter that, apply_patch works, no COM+ errors, no proxy port being added to
setup_marker.jsonwhen shell commands run.It still crashes with
network_access = falseafter the proxy port is written tosetup_marker.json.I reproduced one concrete helper-launch failure mode and prepared a focused red-to-green patch. I initially suspected spaces in the user-profile path, but the failure appears to be in sandbox-helper startup instead.
Reproduction
Using the packaged
codex-cli 0.144.0-alpha.4with:CODEX_HOME(no setup marker or cached sandbox state),workspace-write,C:\Users\Dell Optiplex 7080\codex cli main repro, andapply_patchonly,both patch attempts failed before the target file could be read:
The file remained unchanged and the fresh home never received a completed setup marker.
As a viability check, the same packaged binaries successfully patched the same spaced workspace from a normal filesystem location after sandbox setup completed. This does not isolate the inherited cwd, but it shows that neither the binaries nor spaces alone cause the failure.
Root cause found
In current source,
run_setup_refresh_innercreatesCommand::new(&exe)forcodex-windows-sandbox-setup.exewithout settingcurrent_dir. The setup helper therefore inherits the active workspace as its process cwd.The helper must prepare sandbox access, but it is launched from the workspace before that access is ready.
Proposed fix
Set the setup helper's process cwd independently of the workspace:
CODEX_HOMEas the final fallback.The real workspace remains in the setup payload, so this changes only the bootstrap process cwd, not the sandbox policy or target workspace.
I also prepared regression coverage that:
apply_patchtest;TestCodexBuilder::with_cwdfixture hook so Windows tests do not silently collapse to an 8.3 short temp path.Before rebasing, I verified:
apply_patchregression: passes after the fix;cargo fmt --all -- --check: passed;cargo clippy --tests -p codex-windows-sandbox -- -D warnings: passed;After verification, the branch was cleanly rebased onto current main and contains one commit.
This patch addresses the inherited-working-directory failure mode. It may not cover the separate proxy, refresh-race, WindowsApps ACL, or COM+ failures discussed above.
I understand external PRs are invitation-only. Would a maintainer like me to submit this focused patch?
Apply Patch in Codex suddenly stopped working for me and adding this line in the config.toml file seems to have fixed it for me. Thank you!
Reproduced on a newer Microsoft Store/AppX build during first elevated-sandbox setup on a fresh standard local Windows account.
Environment
OpenAI.Codex_26.721.3996.0_x64__2p2nqsd0c76g0OkObserved behavior
The first setup attempt shows the Windows dialog naming:
Setup stops before a sandbox log is created.
Checks performed
8,803,120bytes.400CF60D47A8F865E33E43815ECADF3369FE71C4AB830C712AA9E949D6B06AE1.Valid.OpenAI OpCo, LLC.%USERPROFILE%\.codex\.sandbox\sandbox.logdoes not exist after the failed setup.CODEX_HOMEorCODEX_SQLITE_HOMEoverride is present.We did not manually execute or copy the helper, use Repair/Reset/reinstall, take ownership of
WindowsApps, change ACLs, disable Defender, alter the sandbox/network settings, or test against existing workspaces.This confirms that the WindowsApps/helper-launch failure still occurs in AppX
26.721.3996.0, with a present, readable, validly signed helper, and can occur before sandbox diagnostic logging initializes.guys disable just disable
features.network_proxyin yourcodex.toml, this genuinely fixes it. Network proxy is still experimental (you can also disable it by runningcodex,/experimentaland disable "Network proxy")I reproduced and investigated what appears to be an additional WindowsApps launch failure mode for this issue. The findings below are privacy-sanitized.
Environment and A/B evidence
C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\....codex.exeorcodex-windows-sandbox-setup.exeas a child process from its package path fails before the helper payload runs (Access is denied/ the Windows “specified module could not be found” dialog, depending on the launch path).WindowsAppsallows it to start. The copied setup helper reaches its expected argument-validation error when invoked without a payload. The source and copied files have identical hashes.apply_patchalias that dispatches to the executable outsideWindowsAppssuccessfully applied a real multiline patch to a workspace file. The existing batch alias also loses/corrupts literal multiline patch arguments in PowerShell, while the.ps1alias preserves them.This suggests the executable itself is valid and that the package location/child-launch context is the important difference.
Current source paths
I checked current
mainat2ca575026cef066a58c70f6bdee4feafa6e63d3aon August 15, 2026.In
codex-rs/arg0/src/lib.rs, the Windowsapply_patch.batalias is still generated againststd::env::current_exe()directly. For a Desktop/AppX launch, that can leave the alias pointing at the packagedWindowsAppscodex.exe:The repository already has executable materialization support in
windows-sandbox-rs/src/helper_materialization.rs, includingresolve_exe_for_launch, but it is not used by this arg0 alias path.In
codex-rs/windows-sandbox-rs/src/setup.rs, both setup launch paths still resolve the packaged helper directly throughfind_setup_exe():The non-elevated/refresh
Commandpath does not setcurrent_dir, and the elevatedShellExecuteExWpath does not setSHELLEXECUTEINFOW.lpDirectory. Therefore the setup helper can both launch fromWindowsAppsand inherit the active workspace as its process working directory. This complements the inherited-cwd failure mode already reported in this thread.Suggested focused fix
WindowsAppspath.codex.exeintoCODEX_HOME\.sandbox-binusing the existing helper-copy logic and dispatch the alias to that copy.codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exeinto the same user-owned helper directory before both refresh and elevated setup launches.CODEX_HOMEas the final fallback..current_dir(...)forCommandandlpDirectoryforShellExecuteExW.apply_patch.ps1alias in addition to the compatibility.batalias so literal multiline patch arguments survive PowerShell command resolution.I prepared a local focused implementation covering those source paths and unit tests, but have not submitted a PR because external code contributions are invitation-only. I can provide the patch if a maintainer would like to review or integrate it.
This does not claim to replace the proxy-state fixes, refresh coalescing, or other failure modes discussed above; it specifically addresses package-path child launches, helper bootstrap cwd, and PowerShell multiline argument forwarding.
Prototype patch uploaded: https://gist.github.com/LDmoxeii/00358d25f598bc56cc4720198a52e62d
Direct raw patch: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/LDmoxeii/00358d25f598bc56cc4720198a52e62d/raw/codex-windows-apply-patch-fix.patch
SHA-256: CFF48A5C2A5BD9DFBB6BE125B9C6A2C330064DBEBF596AF0E35331BDCFB3EEC8
Base commit: 3360f4a909a920d2e534a63c508d98e91fe6655a
It covers WindowsApps executable materialization, a PowerShell apply_patch alias, setup-helper materialization, explicit Command cwd and ShellExecuteExW lpDirectory, plus focused unit tests. git diff --check passes and the patch is privacy-sanitized.
It is still a prototype: full Rust compile, clippy and nextest validation have not been completed, and it should be rebased onto current main before integration.
For Windows apply_patch failures with the
codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exelaunch dialog, the state that matters is in%USERPROFILE%\.codex\.sandbox\setup_marker.json.Method:
%USERPROFILE%\.codex\.sandbox\setup_marker.jsonand inspect theproxy_portsarray.[]and retry apply_patch.features.network_proxy = falseinconfig.toml(or dropHTTP_PROXY/HTTPS_PROXYfrom the elevated environment), then clearproxy_portsonce more.[windows] sandbox = "unelevated"inconfig.tomlto bypass the elevated helper launch path.Evidence: verified locally on Codex Desktop 26.810.7004.0 — with
proxy_ports: []the helper launches from the package path and completes (setup binary completedin the sandbox log), and the thread confirms clearing a non-emptyproxy_portsrestores apply_patch. Independent community workaround; not an official OpenAI fix.