Trusted Access for Cyber verification flow does not start
What issue are you seeing?
I’m unable to start the Trusted Access for Cyber verification flow.
When I open https://chatgpt.com/cyber, the page shows:
“Your identity couldn't be verified or your account is ineligible at this time.”
When I click “Start verification”, I get the following error:
“We couldn't start verification. You may not be eligible for this verification flow right now. Please try again later, or contact support if you think this is a mistake.”
I’m not trying to bypass verification. I’m trying to complete the required Trusted Access verification, but the flow does not start for my account.
I also have an existing support case: 10344764.
Uploaded thread: 019eeba2-990b-7911-bf78-29ebcfa42707
What steps can reproduce the bug?
- Open https://chatgpt.com/cyber while logged into my ChatGPT account.
- Click “Start verification”.
- The verification flow does not open.
- Instead, the page shows:
“We couldn't start verification. You may not be eligible for this verification flow right now. Please try again later, or contact support if you think this is a mistake.”
Uploaded thread: 019eeba2-990b-7911-bf78-29ebcfa42707
What is the expected behavior?
Clicking “Start verification” should start the Trusted Access for Cyber verification flow so I can complete the required identity verification.
If my account is not eligible, the page should provide a clearer account-status explanation or direct me to the correct resolution path.
If this is a stale entitlement state, account eligibility issue, or false-positive restriction, the verification flow should be reset or enabled for my account.
Additional information
I have attached a screenshot showing the error.
My intended use is legitimate and authorized security/development work. I’m requesting review because the verification flow itself does not start, so I cannot complete the required process.
<img width="1187" height="735" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/249b054b-54b0-4107-a21c-6147fe0dbfb5" />
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗