[Windows][Desktop 26.707.12708.0] ChatGPT.exe spawns hundreds of taskkill.exe/conhost.exe processes, causing WMI storms and DWM degradation
[Windows][Desktop 26.707.12708.0] ChatGPT.exe spawns hundreds of taskkill.exe and conhost.exe processes, causing WMI failure storms and DWM degradation
Summary
Codex Desktop on Windows repeatedly leaves taskkill.exe and conhost.exe processes running. During an affected session, 287 live taskkill.exe processes were direct children of the Codex Desktop main process (ChatGPT.exe), with 302 associated conhost.exe processes.
At the same time:
- Windows Management Instrumentation recorded 987 failed queries in two hours.
- The Desktop Window Manager handle count increased from 1,205 to 4,458 without a DWM restart.
- Closing ordinary application windows left a white frame visible for about two seconds.
- Windows UI responsiveness degraded, and DWM CPU usage remained elevated.
The problem returned within about one hour after a clean Windows restart.
Environment
- Windows 10 Pro 22H2, build 19045.6466, x64
- Codex Desktop MSIX package:
OpenAI.Codex_26.707.12708.0_x64__2p2nqsd0c76g0 - Bundled Chromium /
ChatGPT.exe: 150.0.7871.115 - GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- NVIDIA driver: 572.16
- Display environment also included remote-display and virtual-display software. These may amplify DWM load, but the abnormal
taskkill.exeparent chain points directly toChatGPT.exe.
User-visible symptoms
- DWM CPU usage rises and remains above its normal idle level.
- Closing a window leaves a white rectangular frame for about two seconds.
- Typing and application rendering become unreliable when the condition worsens.
- Fully restarting Windows clears the condition temporarily.
- The problem returns while Codex Desktop remains in use.
Process-tree evidence
At 2026-07-17 13:21 local time, a Toolhelp process-tree snapshot showed:
| Process | Live count | Parent |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| taskkill.exe | 287 | All 287 were direct children of ChatGPT.exe PID 7516 |
| conhost.exe | 302 | The newly created instances were children of the taskkill.exe processes |
| ChatGPT.exe | 8 | Main process PID 7516 |
| codex.exe | 1 | Child of ChatGPT.exe PID 7516 |
| codex-code-mode-host.exe | 1 | Child of codex.exe |
The process storm was still active: conhost.exe increased from 296 to 302 in five seconds, while the total process count increased from 897 to 907.
DWM and Codex resource growth
DWM was not restarted during this comparison; it remained PID 2108.
| Measurement | Healthy baseline after restart | Affected state about one hour later |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| DWM handles | 1,205 | 4,458 |
| DWM private working set | about 29 MiB | about 56 MiB |
| DWM processor-time counter | about 9-21% | about 42-85% |
| codex.exe handles | about 542 after a fresh launch | about 3,565 |
The processor-time values above use the Windows per-process performance-counter scale, not Task Manager's whole-system CPU percentage.
GPU counter samples during the affected state showed approximately 177 MiB of local GPU memory attributed to DWM and 100-116 MiB attributed to a ChatGPT.exe GPU process. No corresponding GPU-process crash, DXGI device-loss, or out-of-memory message was found in the Codex logs.
WMI failure storm
The Microsoft-Windows-WMI-Activity/Operational log contained 989 events over two hours. Of these, 987 were Event ID 5858 failures.
A representative failure contained:
Operation = Start IWbemServices::ExecQuery - root\cimv2 :
SELECT * FROM Win32_Process
WHERE ProcessId = ... OR ProcessId = ... [hundreds of process IDs]
ResultCode = 0x800706BA
PossibleCause = Could not send status to client
The recorded ClientProcessId belonged to a short-lived process that had already exited when inspected. The queries repeatedly enumerated a very large set of process IDs, including the accumulating console and cleanup processes.
This explains why the Windows Management Instrumentation service intermittently reached about 20% CPU even though a later 10-second sample returned to 0%: the load occurs in bursts during the failed query loop.
Codex renderer and Windows event evidence
The affected Codex session logged 88 instances of:
ResizeObserver loop completed with undelivered notifications.
They appeared in bursts while the primary renderer window was focused and visible.
No new NVIDIA display-reset event, DWM crash, DXGI device loss, or GPU out-of-memory event was recorded during the clean recurrence window.
Earlier affected sessions also produced Windows Error Reporting records for ChatGPT.exe, including MoAppHang, Top level window is idle, exception 0xc06d007f, and signature PCH_84. Those records may be related but are not required to reproduce the process and WMI growth described above.
Steps to reproduce
- Restart Windows to clear all residual processes.
- Open Codex Desktop and work in a local task that invokes shell commands.
- Continue using the task for approximately one hour. Commands that time out, are cancelled, run concurrently, or produce large output may increase the reproduction rate, but the exact trigger has not been isolated.
- Inspect the process tree under the main
ChatGPT.exeprocess. - Observe accumulating
taskkill.exeprocesses and theirconhost.exechildren. - Inspect
Microsoft-Windows-WMI-Activity/Operationalfor repeated Event ID 5858 failures containing largeWin32_Processqueries. - Observe DWM handle growth and close an ordinary application window. The closed window may leave a white frame for about two seconds.
Expected behavior
- Codex should terminate or reap its Windows cleanup subprocesses.
- Process-tree cleanup should not leave hundreds of
taskkill.exeorconhost.exeinstances. - Cleanup should not repeatedly query hundreds of stale process IDs through WMI.
- DWM resource usage and general Windows UI responsiveness should remain stable during long Codex sessions.
Working diagnosis
The evidence is consistent with a Windows process-cleanup or cancellation loop in Codex Desktop. The main ChatGPT.exe process repeatedly starts taskkill.exe, while WMI is used to inspect a growing process tree. Short-lived query clients exit before WMI can return status, producing repeated Event ID 5858 failures. The accumulated console processes and handles then increase DWM and system UI load.
This is an inference from the live parent chain, counters, and event timing. Source-level confirmation would require inspection by the Codex maintainers.
Current workaround
- Fully exit Codex Desktop instead of only closing its window.
- Restart Windows if residual
taskkill.exeorconhost.exeprocesses remain. - Avoid concurrent shell calls, repeated command cancellation, and very large command output until the cleanup path is fixed.
- Do not restart or terminate DWM or the WMI service as a workaround.
Related reports
- https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/21957
- https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/17229
- https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/33524
- https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/33382
- https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/16374
Privacy note
This report intentionally excludes the Windows username, full local paths, conversation contents, prompts, repository names, raw Codex databases, and complete log files. Sanitized counter output and selected WMI/DWM event records can be provided if maintainers request them.
14 Comments
Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.
Powered by Codex Action
Reproduced on another system: Windows 11 Pro (build 26200), 32-thread CPU, 64 GB RAM, and NVMe storage. The Desktop app updated twice during the session via the in-app prompt (26.707.9981 -> 26.715.2305 -> 26.715.3651; command-runner 0.145.0-alpha.18). The behavior was unchanged across all three versions.
Observed process-creation rate while a single agent turn was active (PID-diffing
Get-Processevery 400 ms; therefore a lower bound because shorter-lived processes can be missed):conhost, 339taskkill /pid <pid> /t /f, and 169gitprocesses, plus PowerShell/CMD helpersWin32_Process.ParentProcessIdshowed that the observedtaskkillandgitchildren were overwhelmingly parented byChatGPT.exeSystem impact during affected periods:
WmiPrvSE.exesustained 20-26% whole-machine CPU on this 32-thread system (approximately 6.5-8 logical cores) while the process storm and repeatedWin32_Processtree queries were occurring. It also reached approximately 11,000 page faults/second.MsMpEngconsumed approximately another 1-3 logical cores. This is consistent with the Defender behavior reported in #30527 and #33875.ChatGPT.exereduced observed spawning from approximately 45/second to approximately 0.4/second andWmiPrvSECPU from approximately 25% to 0.3% immediately.The parent-attribution sampler itself used
Win32_Process, so it could contribute some WMI work. I therefore treat the simultaneous WMI load and process storm as correlation rather than attributing every query totaskkill. The immediate control-experiment drop nevertheless strongly associates the overall load with the active Desktop session.Amplifier: workspace tracking of untracked build caches (consistent with #32113):
The workspace tracker invoked:
as a separate
gitprocess for each untracked file. A repository containing untracked.gocache/directories with 2,274 and 944 files was rehashed file by file on repeated sweeps. Adding.gocache/to.git/info/excluderoughly halved the observedgitspawn rate. Large untracked trees such as build caches,node_modulesvariants, or UnityLibrarydirectories may therefore amplify the problem substantially.Per-command overhead:
%USERPROFILE%\.codex\.sandbox\sandbox.*.logshowed asetup refresh(includingcodex-windows-sandbox-setup.exe), a read-ACL pass, and a command-runner helper copy for each command. Even a trivial one-line read consequently involved approximately 10 observed processes including console hosts and the subsequenttaskkilltree cleanup.Possible mitigation directions, in likely impact order:
taskkill /t /ffor each cleanup, if compatible with the sandbox architecture.hash-object(for example, using--stdin-paths).Source-level root cause and the 26.707 -> 26.715 regression boundary
I performed a read-only inspection of the installed Windows Desktop bundle and correlated it with local Codex logs and live process snapshots. No prompt content, repository names, private paths, or credentials are included below.
Inspected build: MSIX 26.715.3651.0, internal Electron app 26.715.31251 (build 5538), bundled app-server 0.145.0-alpha.18.
This is not merely "too many Git processes." The current Desktop build contains a closed feedback loop with four components.
1. Git cancellation invokes an unbounded process-tree kill
The installed app bundle's Windows cleanup path is equivalent to:
~~~js
await execFile(
path.join(systemRoot, "System32", "taskkill.exe"),
["/pid", String(pid), "/t", "/f"],
{ env, windowsHide: true }
);
~~~
There is no timeout, no single-flight guard, no creation-time/process-identity check, and no upper bound on concurrent cleanup helpers. The host awaits this cleanup promise.
The local Git host enables tree cleanup for Git commands, whose normal default timeout is 60 seconds. Therefore every timeout or cancellation can create another unbounded taskkill.exe /PID ... /T /F process.
2. The live review query creates and cancels per-file Git subprocesses
The Desktop worker keeps live review-summary/status-summary queries subscribed to working-tree, index, HEAD, and config invalidations. The review summary includes untracked files by default.
For untracked metadata, the current worker processes up to 8 files concurrently and runs a separate command for each ordinary file:
~~~text
git hash-object -- <path>
~~~
It can also run a per-file no-index diff. Rapid invalidation or cancellation therefore fans out Git children, and each cancellation enters the taskkill path above. Local logs show review-summary as the request kind and thousands of aborted Git commands/hash-object calls.
This is the primary producer.
3. PID-only /T cleanup becomes a self-sustaining cross-kill loop
In a live sample of 120 taskkill processes created over about 34 seconds:
This is direct evidence that stale PID-only cleanup races with PID reuse. The /T helpers begin terminating cleanup helpers and console hosts spawned by other cleanup attempts. That converts ordinary cancellation churn into a feedback loop.
An independent bounded Toolhelp/.NET cleanup, which did not invoke taskkill, removed 325 taskkill processes, 164 conhosts, and 10 Git processes in one pass and brought taskkill to zero. Re-entering an active affected Desktop task had previously recreated hundreds of helpers, confirming that the Desktop process lifecycle is the active producer rather than Windows spontaneously generating them.
4. Full-machine CIM sampling amplifies the loop into an OS freeze
The child-process snapshot worker first runs a full:
~~~powershell
Get-CimInstance Win32_Process
~~~
It then queries Win32_PerfFormattedData_PerfProc_Process plus PID-filtered Win32_Process data in batches. A heartbeat runs every 30 seconds, while renderer/event-triggered requests can run with only a 5-second minimum interval. A new worker is created for each snapshot.
Once process count explodes, every sample scans a rapidly changing machine-wide PID set. Timed-out clients and quota failures then add CPU, process, thread, handle, and WMI pressure. This explains the observed "out of memory" condition while about 16.8 GB of physical RAM remained free: the exhausted resources were process/thread/handle/WMI quotas, not RAM capacity.
5. The process registry is not crash-safe
chat_processes.json is loaded with JSON.parse and malformed/all-NUL content is not recovered (other than ENOENT). Records may persist with osPid:null. Updates are written directly with writeFile(JSON.stringify(...)); there is no temporary file, fsync, atomic rename, or last-known-good recovery.
That matches the all-NUL corruption already reported in #29593 and can carry bad lifecycle state across sessions.
Local version boundary
These are aggregate markers from local Desktop logs; session lengths differ, so the table is a regression boundary, not a normalized benchmark:
| Desktop version | Sessions | Snapshot failures | WMI quota markers | hash-object calls |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| 26.707.9981 | 9 | 69 | 0 | 0 |
| 26.707.12708 | 2 | 57 | 0 | 0 |
| 26.715.2236 | 1 | 54 | 164 | 22 |
| 26.715.2305 | 6 | 3,831 | 8,632 | 2,697 |
| 26.715.3651 | 6 | 614 | 1,604 | 156 |
The unsafe process-lifecycle design predates 26.715, as this issue and older reports demonstrate. However, the catastrophic WMI-quota/freeze regime begins sharply at the 26.707 -> 26.715 boundary on this machine. The recent update is therefore the severity amplifier/regression boundary, even if it did not invent the original bug.
The public CLI changed from app-server 0.144.5 to 0.145.0-alpha.18 in the same boundary. Public commit 6ad0e943cc72 (#32106) raises ancestor-probe concurrency from 8 to 256, which may add startup pressure, but it is not the direct taskkill source. The Electron/Desktop host source and its update diff are absent from the public repository, so identifying the exact private Desktop commit requires OpenAI to inspect its internal 26.707 -> 26.715 diff. The installed current bundle is sufficient to prove the faulty call chain above.
Required remediation
Release and ownership concern
This is not an acceptable application failure mode. A coding tool must not be able to hard-freeze the host OS and force repeated power cycles while free memory remains. The architectural warning signs were reported separately for months in #17229, #25453, #26812, #29593, #32113, and #32562. The canonical P0 candidate and multiple precursor issues currently have no public assignee or milestone.
Shipping 26.715 without an end-to-end Windows process-churn soak test turned known defects into a system-wide feedback loop. That is a failure of OpenAI's Codex Desktop maintenance and release process, not an individual contributor problem. OpenAI also does not publish the Desktop host source and its CONTRIBUTING policy rejects unsolicited implementation PRs, so OpenAI cannot reasonably shift responsibility for the fix to affected users.
Please assign an owner, publish a mitigation/rollback, pause the affected Windows rollout, and treat this as a release blocker/P0 candidate. I am available to validate a patched build immediately.
Exact regression boundary: build 5484, Git review metadata worker
I narrowed the recent severity regression to a specific production build and shipped bundle file. This refines my previous comment: the unsafe
taskkill /T /F, full CIM sampler, and non-atomicchat_processes.jsondesign already existed, but build 5484 added the high-rate Git subprocess producer that can drive those old defects into a system-wide process/WMI storm.Reproducible four-build comparison
Source: OpenAI's official production appcast: https://persistent.oaistatic.com/codex-app-prod/appcast.xml
I used HTTP Range requests to extract only
resources/app.asarfrom the official ZIPs, parsed each ASAR header, and hashed/searched the relevant bundled files. The build 5488 ASAR SHA-256 independently matches the published distribution hash, and the relevant build 5538 entry hashes exactly match my currently installed Windows package.| Build | Internal version | Windows package mapping |
.vite/build/worker.jsSHA-256 | New per-file review metadata path ||---|---|---|---|---|
| 5440 | 26.707.91948 | prior 26.707 package |
cae41298ee5d729ff00c5a72ae9edb6c767fb6e71139c0d6d62371a5900af387| Absent || 5484 | 26.715.21316 | 26.715.2236.0 |
6fccaf96a129f3b8299793a90ddea15442d8af8a54826faa384ee525da4dae27| First present || 5488 | 26.715.21425 | 26.715.2305.0 |
6fccaf96a129f3b8299793a90ddea15442d8af8a54826faa384ee525da4dae27| Present; byte-identical to 5484 || 5538 | 26.715.31251 | 26.715.3651.0 |
8b4855f500ea4f37df95b41122594c4c3e92bee83c968b49b75419a635bdb540| Still present |The Windows package/build mappings above come from Codex's own local startup logs (reported internal release version and Sparkle build number).
What changed in build 5484
Build 5440 already contains the review-summary feature,
taskkill.exe,Get-CimInstance Win32_Process, andchat_processes.json. However, its worker contains none of these strings:review-working-tree-file-metadataFailed to hash working-tree fileFailed to read untracked Git metadatahash-objectAll four first appear in build 5484 inside
.vite/build/worker.js. The new implementation walks untracked and zero-OID working-tree entries with a concurrency limit of 8 and, per file, launches operations equivalent to:In build 5484/5488 these are located around minified lines 184, 188, and 190. The
review-summarysignal count in this worker also rises from 9 occurrences in build 5440 to 18 in build 5484.That new per-file subprocess fan-out feeds an existing unsafe cancellation path. The local Git host uses
killProcessTree: true; cancellation reaches:The cleanup call has no timeout, no single-flight/coalescing guard, and no process-identity check before killing a potentially reused PID. At the same time, the child-process snapshot worker performs full CIM process/performance queries. Under rapid repo-watch invalidation, the combination is capable of producing exactly the observed feedback loop: many short-lived Git children, many tree-kill cleanups, and WMI query quota exhaustion.
Exact current shipped files (build 5538)
app.asar/.vite/build/worker.jsSHA-256
8b4855f500ea4f37df95b41122594c4c3e92bee83c968b49b75419a635bdb540hash-object: line 184 col 693 and line 190 col 62review-working-tree-file-metadata: line 188 col 7078app.asar/.vite/build/src-tv6ZWK8o.jsSHA-256
8a07ef9ad8a2643b9812341c0ba7c770803664bd1c473f8603b837084f86d72ctaskkill.exe: line 771 col 5661app.asar/.vite/build/child-process-snapshot-worker.jsSHA-256
5fb99e4f2f053613676958cecebacb24401f37cee5bbc294708ec280793cb47cfull CIM/perf query block: line 96
The production ASAR omits the source maps, so the original TypeScript path is not directly recoverable from the official artifact. An unaffiliated reverse-engineered older bundle maps this logic with high confidence to:
main/workers/git-worker-review/metadata.tsmain/workers/git-worker-request-dispatcher.tsmain/workers/git-worker-repo-watch.tsmain/workers/worker-execution-host-client.tsmain/workers/child-process-snapshot-worker.tsReference only (not an official source tree): https://github.com/JimLiu/decode-codex/tree/6fd43d66ccad32c9c1ab83b9704e0bbbbf2d4c7b/restored/main/workers
Requested maintainer action
Please diff internal build 5440 -> 5484 for
main/workers/git-worker-review/metadata.tsfirst. Revert or batch the new per-file subprocess path, coalesce repo-watch invalidations, and bound the queue globally. Independently harden process cleanup with single-flight, timeout, PID identity verification, and a strict cap; make the process registry atomic and corruption-tolerant.This is a release-safety failure across interacting subsystems, not evidence against any individual developer. The key actionable boundary is now specific: build 5484, Git review metadata worker.
Additional clean-reboot reproduction on 26.715.3651.0
I reproduced the same failure on another Windows system after a full reboot. This confirms that the process storm is recreated by a new Codex Desktop session rather than being leftover state from the previous boot.
Environment
OpenAI.Codex_26.715.3651.0_x64__2p2nqsd0c76g0ChatGPT.exe/ Chromium version:150.0.7871.124Clean-reboot reproduction
A six-second snapshot produced:
| Metric | First sample | Six seconds later |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Total processes | 815 | 809 |
|
taskkill.exe| 223 | 220 ||
conhost.exe| 230 | 228 ||
ChatGPT.exe| 8 | 8 || Total handles | 250,518 | 249,684 |
| Total threads | 11,821 | 11,810 |
The overwhelming majority of the live
taskkill.exeinstances were direct children of the Codex Desktop main process,ChatGPT.exePID 33116. Of the live console hosts, 214 hadtaskkill.exeas their direct parent.The process groups accounted for approximately:
taskkill.exe: 219 instances, 2.97 GiB aggregate working set, 36,684 handlesconhost.exe: 227 instances, 1.72 GiB aggregate working set, 22,445 handlesCreation timestamps showed continuous accumulation from about one minute after Codex startup through the next several minutes.
Desktop log evidence
The previous affected run's Codex Desktop log repeatedly recorded:
The same log also contains failures from
BundledPluginsMarketplacewhile executing a heavier process/performance snapshot based onWin32_PerfFormattedData_PerfProc_ProcessandWin32_Process.This evidence is consistent with the reported feedback loop: process-tree sampling fails or stalls, cleanup launches
taskkill.exe /T /F, the cleanup processes and their console hosts accumulate, and subsequent full-machine process enumeration becomes increasingly expensive. The direct parent chain establishes that the cleanup processes originate from Codex; source-level confirmation of the exact retry path still requires maintainer inspection.A previous manual cleanup reduced the machine from approximately 971 processes to 445, but after a clean reboot and relaunch the same condition returned within minutes.
No raw logs, usernames, repository names, conversation contents, or local paths are included here. I can provide additional sanitized counters if maintainers need a specific capture.
Additional reproduction on Windows 10.0.26200 x64 with Codex Desktop
OpenAI.Codex 26.715.2305.0.
Native 50 ms process sampling reproduced:
A severe cleanup recurrence reached:
The packaged app.asar child-process snapshot worker executes the matching
Get-CimInstance Win32_Process / Win32_PerfFormattedData_PerfProc_Process
PowerShell probes. Cockpit Tools was separately stopped and remained absent;
the ChatGPT-owned taskkill/WMI storm still reproduced, so this is not caused
by the local Wiki scripts or Cockpit.
A bounded local mitigation used native Toolhelp snapshots, PID+creation-time
identity, a 10-second age gate and two-snapshot parent-lineage verification.
A one-shot watcher was falsified because births continued after its first
containment. The corrected multi-round watcher made 17 containment attempts,
stopped 284 lineage-verified taskkill processes, never directly stopped
conhost/PowerShell/cmd/ChatGPT, and reached 10 consecutive zero-taskkill
samples. This only mitigates accumulation; it does not prevent upstream births.
Requested upstream fixes:
Correction: exact direct-parent boundary, two independent defects, and maintainer source anchors
I downloaded and compared the complete
worker.jsfiles for build 4559 and its direct child build 5059. This corrects two statements in my earlier comments:cleanupPromise ??=). What is absent is a global cleanup limit/coalescer, timeout, circuit breaker, and PID identity validation.Direct-parent comparison: https://github.com/JimLiu/decode-codex/compare/54c373f781d0ee51f0c16f58ec349ae97a16f941...fa0ef1d8be41adc202d1f92e80cf1937f59ae45a
26.623.70822): https://github.com/JimLiu/decode-codex/blob/54c373f781d0ee51f0c16f58ec349ae97a16f941/ref/.vite/build/worker.js26.707.31428): https://github.com/JimLiu/decode-codex/blob/fa0ef1d8be41adc202d1f92e80cf1937f59ae45a/ref/.vite/build/worker.jsThat repository is an unaffiliated snapshot, not an official source tree. The direct-parent bundle diff is the evidence; OpenAI should verify the corresponding private-source commit internally.
Defect A: the producer continuously creates cleanup work
At build 4559,
worker.js:61466is:At build 5059,
worker.js:61718becomes:Build 5059 also introduces this review-snapshot cancellation path at lines 64904-65069:
The live-query loop at lines 70578-70640 keeps a dirty flag while a request is in flight and schedules another refresh in
finally.review-summaryreacts toworking-treechanges at lines 70669-70677. The repo-event handler at lines 72343-72348 both advances/aborts the review snapshot and callsliveQueryRegistry.handleRepoChanged(...).Therefore repository churn repeatedly aborts active Git children; each distinct child has opted into process-tree cleanup. Build 5484 later increases the rate with per-file
hash-object/ no-index metadata work, but it is an amplifier, not the origin.Defect B: PID-only
/Tcleanup does not convergeBuild 4559 lines 64163-64198 simply call the existing child kill method. Build 5059 lines 64529-64715 add the following code (identifiers expanded for readability, control flow unchanged):
The call stores only a numeric PID. It has no process handle/creation-time identity check, no timeout or abort signal, and no global concurrency bound. The host awaits that helper indefinitely.
This second defect must not be conflated with the producer.
taskkill.exedoes not itself spawn anothertaskkill.exe, and this is not literal JavaScript recursion. The recursion/cross-kill occurs in Windows/Ttree traversal after stale PIDs are reused by peertaskkill.exeorconhost.exeprocesses. Defect A supplies new helpers; Defect B collapses completion throughput. While A remains active,live helpers = births - completionsgrows without bound.Maintainer source-search anchors
The production bundles reference
worker.js.map, but the source maps are omitted. The following unique strings and restored-module boundaries should take an internal maintainer directly to the private TypeScript:main/workers/worker-execution-host-client.ts: searchtaskkill.exe,Local execution host processes do not support resizing, andkillProcessTree.main/workers/git-worker-commands.ts: searchgit process abortedand thehost.spawn(... killProcessTree: true)call.GitReviewSnapshotStaleError,Git snapshot became stale,advanceReviewSnapshot, andinvalidateGitReadCachesForRepoChange.main/workers/git-worker-repo-watch.ts: searchscheduleRepoChangedandGit repo changed.main/workers/git-worker-request-dispatcher.ts/ live-query registry: searchsubscribe-live-query,git-live-query-updated,handleRepoChanged, andreview-summary.main/workers/git-worker-review/metadata.ts(5484+ amplifier): searchreview-working-tree-file-metadata,Failed to hash working-tree file,hash-object, andFailed to read untracked Git metadata.Current official build 5538 still contains the same path:
.vite/build/src-tv6ZWK8o.jsline 771, column 5661:taskkill.exe;.vite/build/src-tv6ZWK8o.jsline 750, column 41972: GitkillProcessTree:true;.vite/build/worker.jsline 181, column 62314:GitReviewSnapshotStaleError;.vite/build/worker.jsline 184, column 693 and line 190, column 62: per-filehash-object;.vite/build/worker.jsline 188, column 7078:review-working-tree-file-metadata.Fresh reproduction separating the two defects
While the affected Desktop task remained active during this investigation, live
taskkill.execount jumped from 0 to 278. A bounded direct, non-tree termination pass against onlytaskkill.execould not settle: after 80 samples it still oscillated at 2-3 because new helpers were being created. A second bounded pass that stopped active Git children and existing taskkill helpers (without/T) reached 15 consecutive zero/zero Git/taskkill samples; a delayed five-second check remained zero/zero.This directly separates the active Git producer from the non-convergent cleanup backlog.
Separate but related release-quality failure: large-conversation UI loading
The same release process is repeatedly shipping an avoidable full-history hydration/rendering problem:
streamingConversationsand broadcasts the completeconversationState, including loaded turn history. It serializes the entire message before applying a 256 MiB limit, so even dropped payloads incur construction, serialization, allocation, and copying cost.These reports are all open. The remedy is conventional application engineering, not an unsolved research problem: send metadata plus a bounded recent tail, page older turns, virtualize rendered rows, keep large image/base64/tool payloads off the critical path, apply byte/count gates before serialization, and add backpressure/cancellation when switching threads.
It is not publicly knowable which internal OpenAI department is supposed to supervise this. What is publicly observable is that this P0 candidate still has no assignee, the unsafe process code has shipped from build 5059 through current build 5538, and multiple source-backed large-history reports remain open while the same unbounded paths continue shipping.
That is a release-governance and cross-subsystem ownership failure. A Windows Desktop release gate should cover both:
Please assign explicit owners for process lifecycle and conversation hydration, publish the affected/fixed build boundary, and treat failure of either soak test as a release blocker.
Controlled A/B isolation: the Desktop child-process snapshot sampler triggers the WMI CPU storm
This is a follow-up to openai/codex#33776 with a controlled isolation result from the currently shipped Windows build.
Environment
26200.8875(25H2)OpenAI.Codex_26.715.3651.0_x64__2p2nqsd0c76g0Confirmed observations before the intervention
26.715.3651.0build still reproduced the failure. Within roughly 20 seconds of a fresh Codex session, 22taskkill.exeprocesses accumulated andWmiPrvSE.exereached a raw per-process processor-time reading of about 1527% (about 47.7% of a 32-logical-processor machine). A separate Task Manager capture reached 71.2% whole-machine CPU for one WMI Provider Host.Microsoft-Windows-WMI-Activity/Operationalshowed repeatedWin32_ProcessandWin32_PerfFormattedData_PerfProc_Processwork. Representative failures were0x800706BAwithCould not send status to client, consistent with the short-lived PowerShell client exiting while WMI work was still active.ChatGPT.exeprocess..vite/build/child-process-snapshot-worker.jsand its sampler manager. On Windows, the worker runs a PowerShell sequence equivalent to:Get-CimInstance Win32_Processto collect PID/parent relationships;Get-CimInstance Win32_PerfFormattedData_PerfProc_Processto collect per-process CPU data;Get-CimInstance Win32_Process -Filter "ProcessId = ... OR ..."query for details.Controlled intervention and result
As a diagnostic isolation test, the legacy Windows
PerfProcprovider was disabled with:Stale
WmiPrvSE.exeand already accumulatedtaskkill.exeprocesses were stopped once after the provider change.The same probe used by the sampler then failed fast with
Invalid classin approximately 748 ms:Because the shipped worker sets
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'and issues thePerfProcquery before the large PID-filtered detail query, the failure aborts the snapshot command before the expensive follow-up query runs.After one complete 39-second observation window:
taskkill.execount:0;0.05%of the whole machine;A later live check on the same active Codex session still showed:
taskkill.exe:0system-wide;PerfProc: disabled;This is a strong A/B result that isolates the child-process snapshot path as the trigger for the WMI CPU component. It does not prove that every
taskkill.execleanup defect has the same internal cause; the cleanup backlog and the WMI sampler should remain separately fixable defects.Important limitation
Disabling
PerfProcis a machine-wide, reversible diagnostic workaround, not a product-level fix and not a suitable general recommendation. It makes legacy per-process performance-counter/WMI classes unavailable. It can be restored with:The installed Codex package was not modified. The upstream sampler still runs and still needs a real fix.
Requested upstream changes
ORfilters againstWin32_Process.Claim boundary
PerfProcquery eliminated the observed WMI runaway andtaskkillaccumulation during the validation windows.0x800706BAclient-gone failures and runaway CPU.PerfProcis a root fix, or that all Codex child processes were zombies. Most of the earlier 216 descendants were live Codex/MCP/Node/Python components; the clearly abnormal residue was the accumulating cleanup helpers and overlapping WMI workers.Temporary mitigation for affected Windows users: Codex Process Guard
For developers who already updated Codex Desktop and are hitting the
taskkill.exe/conhost.exeprocess storm, I published a small independent emergency guard:https://github.com/BIOcanse/CodexProcessGuard
It uses native Toolhelp snapshots plus PID creation-time and ancestry validation to contain only verified Codex-owned cleanup helpers and directly owned Git processes. It does not patch Codex or eliminate the upstream producer bug; it limits the runaway resource storm so affected developers can keep using Codex while OpenAI prepares a proper fix.
The current release supports Windows 10/11 x64, requires no administrator rights or separate .NET installation, and fails closed if the expected Codex package ancestry cannot be verified. Please read the README and verify the published SHA-256 before running the unsigned binary.
Latest release: https://github.com/BIOcanse/CodexProcessGuard/releases/latest
Diagnostic update: the Git child-process timeout precedes the
taskkill/ WMI stormI need to correct an earlier working hypothesis: clearing the sidebar/workspace history does not fix this problem. I rolled back that isolation change and restored the original state. The state database passes
quick_check, and the failure still reproduces even when startup work is reduced to only one or two repositories.Testing again with Codex Desktop 26.715.4045.0 narrows the failure boundary further:
sidebar_workspace_task_groups_task_dirs/ Git-origin discovery work starts.execFilecontrol test also completes normally.``
text
``taskkill.exe /pid <pid> /t /f
taskkill→ WMI process enumeration → further cancellation storm described in the original report. Eventually internal RPCs and the main window stop responding.Additional exclusion tests:
Win32_Process/ performance-process WMI queries complete normally outside Desktop (roughly 0.7–1.0 seconds). WMI amplifies the cleanup storm but is not the initial trigger.Revised working diagnosis
The evidence now points to a Windows-specific defect in the Desktop wrapper's Git child-process lifecycle path: spawn, stdout/stderr completion, cancellation, or reaping. A single Git subprocess that does not complete correctly is amplified by concurrent, unbounded
taskkill /Tcleanup into the visible process/WMI storm and application hang.This is the narrowest boundary that can be established without OpenAI's source, private symbols, or an internal trace. The exact lock or failing code path still requires maintainer-side instrumentation.
Requested fix / instrumentation
Please investigate the Windows Desktop child-process wrapper used by Git-origin discovery, especially:
taskkill.exetree for every timed-out command;A full Windows restart temporarily clears the accumulated process/IPC state, so Desktop works for roughly 10–20 minutes before the cycle starts again. This explains why rebooting appears to help but does not resolve the defect.
I can provide sanitized timestamps and selected logs privately if maintainers need them.
I implemented and isolated-tested a bounded cleanup change in the public Rust process paths, but I want to keep the claim narrower than the full Desktop/WMI report here.
Public comparison:
https://github.com/openai/codex/compare/main...luziyi123448-gif:codex/loop-death-fix?expand=1
The Windows portion of the branch:
KILL_ON_JOB_CLOSE;taskkillfallback no-window, bounded to two seconds, and single-flight;The task-owned Windows regression starts a short-lived parent/child helper tree, verifies neither helper has a console window, closes the Job, waits for both exact process handles to exit, and asserts that the task-owned
taskkillattempt counter did not increase. The error-164 injection test verifies that later process creation is suppressed after the breaker trips. Both tests pass on the rebased branch; the fullcodex-rmcp-clientpackage also passes 109/109 tests.Scope boundary: this does not modify or claim to fix the closed-source Desktop child-process snapshot worker, its PowerShell/WMI sampler, or every
ChatGPT.execleanup producer discussed in this issue. It addresses the public exec-server/rmcp process-tree and fallback amplification paths. The compare also contains the separately reported completed-thread lifecycle fix from #33957; it can be split if maintainers invite a focused contribution.Additional Windows Codex Desktop diagnostics
Feedback/session ID:
019f7a60-2f25-7de2-be94-44b7ddb83f2bEnvironment: Windows, Codex Desktop package
26.715.4045.0(ChatGPT.exefile version150.0.7871.124).I reproduced the issue on Windows Codex Desktop by opening Codex and a project chat without entering a prompt or starting a task.
Confirmed correlated activity chain
Across the completed ETW, WMI, and Process Monitor diagnostics, the measured values were:
WmiPrvSE.exeCPU: 18.6346%WmiPrvSE.exeCPU: 35.7490%git.exe config --null --get core.fsmonitorgit.exeprocesses: 171taskkill.exePIDs: 153The filtered Process Monitor data also showed repeated
status,ls-files,diff,hash-object,rev-parse, andmerge-baseoperations. The saved Process Monitor event timestamps span 58.257 seconds, although the intended manual capture duration was 30 seconds; intervals above were calculated from the observed timestamps.Verdict and limitation
PARTIAL_CAUSE_CONFIRMED
The repeating Git operation and the tight temporal correlation with repeated
taskkill.exeactivity are confirmed. However, the selected Process Monitor filter did not retain the command-line arguments or target PID oftaskkill.exe, so it does not yet prove thattaskkill.exewas terminating those specific Git PIDs. The exact internal Codex component responsible for initiating the outer process chain is also not captured by this dataset.Rejected hypotheses
The following were tested and rejected as necessary causes:
chat_processes.jsonMost likely direction
The strongest remaining direction is a repository watcher or overlapping repository-state checks that lack single-flight protection or rate limiting. A per-repository single-flight guard would prevent a new Git state-refresh batch from starting while the previous batch is still active.
Related issue: #34005, which reports repeated
git config --null --get core.fsmonitoractivity.Privacy and local artifacts
The raw PML is intentionally not being published because it may contain sensitive local metadata.
The following sanitized files exist locally but are not attached to this comment:
PROCMon-GIT-TASKKILL-REPORT.mdprocmon-git-taskkill-safe.csvConfirmation: same review-summary → git abort → taskkill storm on Windows Desktop 26.715.7063.0
This matches the chain described in #30820 / #33776 / #32113 / #27570. Local evidence below (no prompt content, no secrets).
Environment
OpenAI.Codex26.715.7063.0 (OpenAI.Codex_2p2nqsd0c76g0)git status~50–65 ms, no merge/rebase/index.lock,fsck --connectivity-onlyOK)Symptom
codex://threads/new?path=..., background work still targets a previously saved local project in the sidebar15s process sample (during active storm, post-update)
PID-diffing style sampler (unique short-lived PIDs over 15s):
| Metric | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Unique
taskkill.exe| 262 (~17.5/s) || Unique
git.exe| 226 (~15.1/s) || ChatGPT CPU seconds (15s window) | 5.88 |
| ChatGPT processes | 8 |
Baseline with Desktop fully exited:
UniqueTaskkill=0, no ChatGPT/CodexMicroService.Desktop log signature (exact fields)
Log root:
Repeated pattern:
Aborted Git subcommands observed:
git hash-objectgit diff --no-index(per untracked file, e.g.scratch/*.py)git diff --cachedgit statusgit diffagainst HEAD for a small set of tracked changesTrigger cwd in current session (redacted base):
Also previously observed on a second local monorepo under the same parent folder.
Representative command shapes (same as other reports):
Also saw sidebar PR chip work against the same cwd:
Two-day log aggregation (local)
From recent non-empty Desktop logs:
review-summary-related Git complete lines: 4476cwd: 3706 (all failed/aborted)Git snapshot became stale: 55Important negative findings (not root cause)
git status~65 ms in the hottest project<local-project-A>restored from sidebar / local projects — clean worktree alone is not a durable fixGlobal state / project registry shape
.codex-global-state.jsoncontained multiplelocal-projectsentries and aselected-projectpointing at the dirty project. Desktop restored/scanned that project even when the user deep-linked into a different clean path. This aligns with #32113 (saved/inactive projects still scanned) and #30820 (startup restore → eager review-summary).Workspace shape that amplifies (not required for the bug, but makes it severe)
Hot project approximately:
scratch/(order of ~90+ files) plus other untracked dirs.gitignoredid not cover scratch/diagnostics dumpshash-object/diff --no-indexis enough to feed the cancel/taskkillloop on WindowsA/B already tried (local)
| Attempt | Result |
| --- | --- |
| App update 26.715.4045 → 26.715.7063 | Still reproduces |
| Clean linked worktree deep-link | Current project quiet; other saved project still storms |
| Precise
.git/info/exclude| Did not stop loop ||
git add -Nintent-to-add | Did not stop; reverted || Fully exit Desktop | Storm stops immediately |
Request
Please treat this as another independent Windows confirmation on 26.715.7063.0 of:
review-summary/review_modelover restored or saved local projectstaskkill /T /Fcleanup feedback loop freezing process enumeration / Task ManagerHappy to validate a patched Desktop build quickly. Can also provide sanitized log excerpts on request.
Same issue here, ChatGPT/Codex windows app is stuck in a runaway process-enumeration loop with taskkill.exe whenever launched, causing WMI to get stuck at 25% CPU constantly, lagging my entire PC.