Critical UX Violations in Model Selection Pop-up: Glaring Terminology Mismatches & Severe Workflow Friction
What version of the Codex App are you using (From “About Codex” dialog)?
Version 26.721.41059
Released Jul 25, 2026
What subscription do you have?
plus
What platform is your computer?
macos
What issue are you seeing?
Hidden Model Selection: The model selection menu is buried under "Advanced" settings. Industry standard is a clear, 2-step max dropdown. Hiding this adds unnecessary friction for power users.
Inconsistent Terminology: The labels for model intensity/reasoning levels are wildly inconsistent (e.g., mixing "Light" with "Minimal", and "Max" with "Extra High").
Unnecessary UI Elements: The model intensity selection uses a slider/progress bar with unnecessary animations that add zero functional value.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
Open the Codex desktop application and start a new session or open an existing one.
Attempt to change the active model or adjust the reasoning effort for the current prompt.
Observe that the model selection is not immediately accessible and requires digging into the "Advanced" settings menu.
Once inside the pop-up, observe the UI components: an animated progress bar/slider is used for discrete model intensity selection, and the terminology is completely mismatched (e.g., UI labels showing "Light" and "Max" while the tooltips or other UI states show "Minimal" and "Extra High").
What is the expected behavior?
Immediate Access: Model selection and reasoning effort should be available directly on the main chat interface (e.g., via a clear dropdown or segmented control), requiring no more than 2 clicks. It should absolutely not be hidden under "Advanced" settings.
Consistent Terminology: Terms used for model intensity must be unified across the entire application (choose either Light/Max OR Minimal/Extra High, and stick to it).
Functional UI over "Clever" Design: Replace the animated slider/progress bar with standard, instant-response UI components. Users need clarity and speed, not unnecessary visual animations for a settings toggle.
Additional information
_No response_
1 Comment
Potential duplicates detected. Please review them and close your issue if it is a duplicate.
Powered by Codex Action