Codex breaks down in a python SDK to typescript conversion

Resolved 💬 1 comment Opened Apr 30, 2025 by mvanleest Closed Aug 7, 2025

What version of Codex is running?

0.1.2504251709

Which model were you using?

o4-mini

What platform is your computer?

darwin | arm64 | 24.3.0

What steps can reproduce the bug?

  • ```

Hi! I need to port a python SDK over to a typescript version of the sdk. It's a neo bank api from the company bunq. I've downloaded the python sdk in the folder repos/bunq/python/sdk_python-1.28.0 and the typescript port should be added to the folder repos/bunq/typescript/v1. Please provide a plan where you use vitest for all tests. and after you give the plan we will see how we will execute the plan.
```

  • 2 reasoning | 0 tool
  • ```

This looks good. 1 thing you need to change. I use pnpm and not npm. So please make sure that pnpm is used and is working and do not use npm.
```

  • 2 reasoning | 0 tool
  • ```

ready!
```

  • 36 reasoning | 15 tool
  • ```

this is an invalid command. please use pnpm init
```

  • 11 reasoning | 12 tool
  • ```

start
```

  • 48 reasoning | 18 tool
  • ```

Go on
```

  • 53 reasoning | 16 tool
  • ```

keep going
```

  • 5 reasoning | 6 tool
  • ```

keep going untill you are finished with the complete sdk
```

  • 91 reasoning | 27 tool
  • ```

continue
```

  • 11 reasoning | 10 tool
  • ```

automate
```

  • 5 reasoning | 4 tool
  • ```

refine
```

  • 3 reasoning | 3 tool
  • ```

do it all
```

  • 5 reasoning | 4 tool
  • ```

try again
```

  • 0 reasoning | 0 tool
  • ```

try again
```

  • 0 reasoning | 0 tool
  • ```

please fix the error
```

  • 0 reasoning | 0 tool
  • ```

no tool found error. how do i fix it?
```

  • 0 reasoning | 0 tool
  • ```

rerun request id req_b94c3352c359726847d8f43f5a6a089c
```

  • 0 reasoning | 0 tool

What is the expected behavior?

a way to fix the issue

What do you see instead?

An error that I can't resolve.

Additional information

_No response_

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗